Did "political correctness" relegate Esteban to a background role in Cabeza de Vaca's account?

  

A friend proposed that Cabeza de Vaca deliberately kept Esteban in the background in his 1542 book -- even possibly with Esteban's knowledge and approval.
      Cabeza de Vaca never mentioned Esteban in the first half of his account about the Narváez expedition to Florida.  During their cross-continent trek, Cabeza de Vaca referred to the African slave only sporadically by name and usually by labeling Esteban as El Negro, or he even credited Esteban's achievements to others. One could askt how well could Cabeza de Vaca expect his account to be accepted by the Spanish king or Europeans in slave-holding societies if he gave full credit to Esteban the African slave for ensuring the survival of the three Spaniards by using his language skills to lead the Spaniards to safety through the unknown northern Mexico wilderness?
      Perhpas Cabeza de Vaca felt compelled to put himself into the most heroic leadership role, and keep Esteban's role under-stated, if he wanted his account to be believable in those sixteenth-century times. 

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.